Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study examines DISC traits and well-being in medical students, suggesting cultural factors matter more.
This cross-sectional pilot study examined associations between DISC personality traits (Dominance, Influence, Steadiness, Conscientiousness) and psychological well-being among 62 medical students from 10 countries at a private university in Saudi Arabia. Well-being was measured with the WHO-5 well-being index (mean=14.08, SD=4.99) using simplified self-categorization for DISC assessment. Steadiness (69.4%) and Conscientiousness (66.1%) were the most frequently endorsed traits, consistent with patterns observed in other medical trainee populations. No significant associations were found between any DISC trait and WHO-5 well-being scores. Effect sizes were small (Steadiness g=0.43, 95% CI − 0.06 to 1.00; Influence g=0.34, 95% CI − 0.17 to 0.89), and multivariable regression explained minimal variance (R 2 =0.074). Conscientiousness prevalence differed across countries (P=0.001), although subgroup sizes were small. These null findings suggest no association between DISC traits and well-being in this pilot sample, contrasting with recent studies reporting DISC associations with perceived stress. This divergence highlights important distinctions between stress reactivity and baseline well-being as outcomes. Broader contextual factors including academic workload, institutional support, and cultural context may be more relevant to well-being than behavioral style alone. DISC may be more appropriately applied to communication training and team development rather than well-being prediction. Future research should employ validated DISC instruments, larger culturally balanced samples, and examine both stress and well-being outcomes to clarify the differential predictive utility of personality profiles across psychological constructs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shahab et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: