Field experiment evaluates fertilizer effects on yield stability, soil quality, and carbon footprint for sustainable agriculture.
Although controlled-release urea (CRU) has demonstrated higher nitrogen use efficiency compared to conventional urea, comprehensive evaluations of its multi-year continuous application on yield stability and environmental sustainability remain limited. A field experiment initiated in 2013 in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain compared the effects of two coated ureas and conventional urea on sustainable yield, soil quality, and carbon footprint. Sulfur-coated urea achieved optimal balance among productivity, economic benefits, and environmental performance, while polymer-coated urea excelled in soil quality. The findings emphasize the importance of multi-criteria evaluation in fertilizer selection and provide scientific evidence for sustainable fertilizer management in intensive maize production systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: