Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This mesocosm study investigates the impact of halophytes and benthic fauna on sediment purification, indicating potential biological strategies for contamination reduction.
Early-stage responses of halophytes ( Phragmites australis , Spartina alterniflora ) and benthic fauna ( Helice tridens , Perinereis linea , Cyclina sinensis ) to contaminated sediments were investigated using a mesocosm system. This study explicitly focuses on elucidating the transient dynamics and biological adjustments following initial physical disturbance. Results indicated high temporal variability, reflecting active non-equilibrium system responses rather than steady-state conditions. Compared with bare flats (115% residual), biological treatments consistently showed lower sediment metal(loid) residuals (halophytes: 89–93%; macrofauna: 74%). Specifically, P. australis exhibited phytoextraction via shoot translocation, whereas S. alterniflora demonstrated phytostabilization through root retention. Notably, C. sinensis contributed to significant contamination reduction (≥50%), while P. linea and H. tridens served as potential bioindicators. These findings represent preliminary, process-oriented observations of early-phase biogeochemical interactions rather than evidence of sustained remediation efficiency. By characterizing these initial stabilization mechanisms, this study provides a critical foundation for designing future long-term sediment restoration strategies. • Halophytes & benthic macrofauna facilitate heavy metal extraction from contaminated sediments. • Heavy metal uptake varies based on species, density, and ecological roles in the marine ecosystem. • P. australis and S. alterniflora exhibit diverse phytoremediation strategies with increased density. • Filter-feeding C. sinensis shows high accumulation of multiple heavy metals among benthic species. • Species-specific phytoremediation & bioturbation influence sediment metal profiles and availability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kwon et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: