Façade-integrated solar cooling technologies enable the utilisation of façade surface potential and the provision of resilient cooling. This work compares three solar cooling scenarios, positioning a solar cooling element in the west and east façades. The 2ACE scenario is based on a compact adsorption cooling concept, while the 2PV scenario directly drives a compression chiller with photovoltaic elements, and 2PVB incorporates an additional battery. All Modelica system models are implemented in Modelon Impact and operated using dynamic optimisation for the hottest day of the year. Results indicate that the 2ACE scenario, utilising the adsorbent Silica Gel SG123, achieves near to double the self-sufficiency compared to Zeolite 13X. No clear optimal area balance between west and east elements is apparent. The 2PV scenario only surpasses the 2ACE scenario’s self-sufficiency with increased total element area, whereas 2PVB enables a drastic increase and complete self-sufficiency. This highlights the limitation of the adsorption cooling scenario due to its inability to compensate for ventilation’s electrical energy consumption. However, photovoltaic scenarios are heavily reliant on the assumed energy efficiency ratio. Additionally, slender buildings with a low AV ratio require less façade area to achieve the same self-sufficiency level as wider buildings.
Weber et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: