Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The investigation reveals phytochemical variability in Mentha species over three years, suggesting diverse applications.
Species of the genus Mentha are valued for their aroma and bioactivity. This study presents a comprehensive 3-year (2022-2024) evaluation of two Mentha spicata and three Mentha × piperita genotypes. Methanolic extracts were analyzed for total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), and antioxidant activity (AA) using spectrophotometry; individual phenolic compounds were determined by HPLC-DAD, and essential oils (EOs) were characterized by GC-MS. Significant inter- and intra-species variability was observed. M. × piperita showed higher phytochemical levels (TPC: 33.61-55.23 mg GAE/g DW; TFC: 27.56-43.01 mg CE/g DW; and AA: 46.48-103.93 mg TE/g DW) than M. spicata (TPC: 28.92-39.57 mg GAE/g DW; TFC: 23.48-35.11 mg CE/g DW; and AA: 40.09-93.59 mg TE/g DW). Rosmarinic acid predominated in all samples (6227.11 to 29321.70 µg/g DW), with elevated levels observed in M. × piperita. EO yields ranged from 0.55% to 2.31% (v/w), with carvone dominant in M. spicata and menthone, dl-menthol, or piperitenone oxide in M. × piperita. Principal component analysis confirmed distinct chemical differentiation among genotypes. Genotype had a strong, and year a moderate, effect on phytochemical profiles. These results highlight the species-specific potential of Mentha for food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pluháčková et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: