PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 5, 2026Knee Surgery and Related Research1 citationsOpen Access

MRI-based classification of lateral hinge fractures in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy

WJWoon-Hwa JungMKMinish Raghunath KatkarMSMin-Seok Seo

Key Points

  • The study aims to investigate lateral hinge fracture variants and develop an MRI-based classification.
  • Analyzed 250 knees from 227 patients who underwent medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy.
  • Used MRI to detect lateral hinge fractures and classified them into four types based on fracture line pattern.
  • Followed up with radiographs and CT scans to monitor outcomes.
  • Type A fractures had shorter union time (3.66 months) compared to types B, C, and D.
  • Type B fractures exhibited a 20% delayed union rate, higher than type A's 2.46%.
  • Statistical analysis confirmed type A fractures had significantly better outcomes than types B, C, and D.

Abstract

Abstract Aim To investigate the variants of lateral hinge fracture and its outcome, as well as to develop a MRI based classification on the fracture line pattern. Methods This retrospective study analyzed 250 knees from 227 patients (169 females, 58 males) who underwent medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Lateral hinge fractures were detected using MRI and classified into four types on the basis of the fracture line pattern: type A (proximal to the tibiofibular joint), type B (into the proximal tibiofibular joint), type C (distal to the tibiofibular joint), and type D (proximal into the joint). Patients were followed up with radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans to monitor outcome. Results Type A fractures had a shorter union time (3.66 months) than type B (5.17 months), type C (6.24 months), and type D (5.75 months). Type B had a delayed union rate of 20%, higher than that of type A (2.46%). Statistical analysis confirmed that type A fractures had significantly better outcomes than types B, C, and D. Type B fractures are by definition Takeuchi type I fractures but exhibit clinical characteristics similar to type II fractures, including longer union times and a higher risk of delayed union. Conclusions Type A fracture has union rates similar to those in non-fracture groups, whereas type B fracture has clinical similarities to Takeuchi type II fractures and therefore should be considered and managed as a subtype of Takeuchi type II fractures.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jung et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a91d7cd6127c7a504c0497https://doi.org/10.1186/s43019-026-00312-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper