Demonstrates improved hydrogen production and CO2 capture in unitized reversible fuel cells, indicating a new design approach.
The development of efficient and scalable energy storage systems remains a major challenge in the transition to renewable energy. Unitized reversible fuel cells (URFCs), capable of operating in both electrolysis and fuel cell modes, offer a promising solution. In this context, integrating the chlor-alkali process into URFCs enables not only cost-effective energy storage but also environmental benefits such as CO₂ capture via alkaline absorption. While chlor-alkali electrolysis is well established, the reversible operation is not well known. This study addresses a key design question: the role of carbon-based materials in electrode architecture, specifically in the use of a carbon-based microporous layer. Titanium felt electrodes were modified with microporous layers (MPLs) containing 1, 2, and 3 mgC/cm² and coated with a RuO₂-Pt catalyst using a Pechini-type polymeric precursor method. The results showed that increasing the carbon content, the electrode resistance was reduced and surface hydrophobicity was enhanced, achieving the best results with 2 mgC/cm² in the MPL. Moreover, in electrolysis mode, the hydrogen production efficiency improved with temperature, reaching 15 mgH₂/Wh at 60 °C (surpassing industrial benchmarks). The system also achieved high Faradaic efficiency for hydrogen production (>98%) and enabled simultaneous CO₂ capture via cathodic alkaline absorption. In fuel cell mode, the optimized electrode reached a peak power density of ∼30 mW/cm² at 60 °C, an order of magnitude higher than previously reported in the literature for similar systems. The results are very promising and position chlor-alkali-based reversible electrochemical cells as a promising platform for efficient, scalable, and multifunctional energy storage and conversion technologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gomaa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: