Theoretical framework predicts fundamental constants in particle physics, highlighting new experimental tests at the LHC.
Quantum Spectrodynamics (QSD) is a theoretical framework that derives Standard Model gauge couplings from a single structural input: the [[5,1,3]] perfect quantum error-correcting code. The code determines two graphs - the complete graph K₄ (bulk exchange interactions) and the cycle graph C₅ (geometric dynamics) - from which three fundamental constants emerge: Holographic bit density: H-0.3em b₄ = 1/4 ln 2 Geometric strain: = 3/80φ² Spectral bond: = π φ² From these, with zero free parameters and a single experimental input (the Planck mass), QSD derives: Symbol Observable QSD Prediction Experimental Value Agreement α⁻¹ Fine structure constant $137.033$ $137.036$ $22$ ppm αₛ(MZ) Strong coupling at MZ $0.11781$ 0.1180 ± 0.0009 $0.16%$ sin²θW Weak mixing angle $0.23122$ 0.23122 ± 0.00003 $< 0.01%$ mH Higgs boson mass $126.7$ GeV $125.25$ GeV $1.3%$ Esyn Syndrome energy $28.24$ GeV ~ 28 GeV* $0.2%$ *CMS dimuon anomaly (CMS-PAS-HIG-20-009) The framework makes falsifiable predictions testable at the LHC. Repository Structure The release contains the main preprint plus seven supplements, one technical note, computational validation code, and interactive visualizations: Theory Documents (LaTeX) - quantum_spectrodynamics.tex - Main paper: complete framework, predictions, and falsification criteria- qsd_s1_formal_proofs_v2.tex - Supplement S1: Formal proofs of all algebraic results (K₄ spectrum, S₄ representation theory, C₅ Laplacian, master theorems)- qsd_s2_energy_scale.tex - Supplement S2: Energy scale derivation and dressing corrections- qsd_s3_lagrangian.tex - Supplement S3: The QSD Lagrangian (field-theoretic formulation)- qsd_s4_renormalization_v2.tex - Supplement S4: Topological renormalization (terminating perturbation series, α⁻¹ = 137.033 derivation)- qsd_s5_syndrome_prediction.tex - Supplement S5: Syndrome prediction (28 GeV) and proton stability- qsd_s6_string_correspondence.tex - Supplement S6: Correspondence with string theory- qsd_s7_cosmological_constant.tex - Supplement S7: Computational thermodynamics (speculative)- qsd_tn1_Hb_Redefinition.tex - Technical Note TN-1: Holographic bit density redefinition Shared LaTeX Infrastructure - qsd_preamble.tex - Unified preamble (notation, macros, theorem environments)- qsd_references.bib - Consolidated bibliography for all documents Computational Validation (Python) - qsd_constants.py - Single source of truth for all QSD constants; reproduces every numerical prediction- qsd_simulation_suite.py - Full simulation suite: algebraic verification, coupling derivations, Monte Carlo error propagation- qsd_monte_carlo.py - Monte Carlo error propagation for all predictions- qsd_qiskit_suite.py - Qiskit quantum circuit simulations: [[5,1,3]] stabilizers, VQE ground state, syndrome extraction- qsd_qiskit_additions.py - Extended Qiskit circuits: additional experiments and validation- qsd_syndrome_production.py - Syndrome production simulation (LHC phenomenology) Visualizations - qsd_animations.py - Animated visualizations (Matplotlib)- qsd_visualizations.py - Static visualization module- qsd_4simplex.html - Interactive 3D visualization: 4-simplex geometry (Three.js)- qsd_4simplex_network.html - Interactive 3D visualization: code network structure (Three.js)- qsd_4simplex_snap_mechanism.html - Interactive 3D visualization: snap mechanism animation (Three.js) Epistemic Transparency All claims are classified as Derived (mathematically proved from the [[5,1,3]] axiom), Constructed (ingredients derived, assembly physically motivated), or Open (plausible but not rigorous). This classification is maintained throughout all documents. How to Verify Run python qsd_constants.py to reproduce every numerical prediction from first principles. Run python qsd_simulation_suite.py for the full validation suite. Qiskit circuits require pip install qiskit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marek Hubka (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: