Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This lecture explores ethical digital humanities practices in the context of public engagement and ecological issues.
This lecture explores what socially responsible digital humanities can look like in the face of environmental crisis, technological inequity, and evolving relationships between academia and the public. Drawing inspiration from Bethany Nowviskie's 2014 Digital Humanities keynote, "Digital Humanities in the Anthropocene," it takes up her central question, "What are our best, shared hopes for DH?," as an opportunity to explore how digital humanities practitioners might critically examine their own infrastructures, engage meaningfully with communities, and imagine more ethical futures. Organized around three interrelated modes of practice: Critique + Interrogate, Engage + Empower, and Imagine + Speculate, the lecture will provide examples from and examine how digital humanities as a field has become increasingly attuned to the material, social, and ecological conditions that underlie digital humanities work, and more broadly society, today.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anna Kijas (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: