Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved vehicle dynamics in half-vehicle mechatronic suspensions, suggesting better comfort and control.
To address the limitations of existing quarter-vehicle models in capturing pitch motion and front-rear coupling effects, this paper proposes a half-vehicle mechatronic suspension system based on the electromechanical analogy. Traditional methods often overlook non-ideal effects and the dynamic interaction between the front and rear wheels. This paper constructs an equivalent electrical network model for the half-vehicle suspension system. To ensure the physical realizability of the system, parameter optimization is performed under positive-real constraints using the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II). This approach achieves an optimal trade-off between vertical vibration suppression and pitch control. Simulation results under random road input at a vehicle speed of 20 m/s indicate that while the unconstrained mechatronic suspension improves ride comfort, it increases the dynamic tire load by 19.18%. In contrast, the constrained mechatronic suspension reduces RMS vertical body acceleration by 19.54% and pitch angular acceleration by 2.22% compared to the standard passive suspension. Additionally, a reduction of 8.29% was observed in the suspension working space RMS, alongside a 1.26% decrease in the dynamic tire load. These results demonstrate that introducing appropriate positive-real constraints effectively balances ride comfort and road-holding performance, providing a systematic modeling and optimization framework for half-vehicle mechatronic suspensions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: