Key result
Contact PFA produces ~63% deeper myocardial lesions than non-contact ablation.
Why the study?
The influence of contact force, contact status, and application count on lesion characteristics during bipolar biphasic circular pulsed field ablation remained uncertain.
Does stable catheter-tissue contact and increased application count improve lesion depth during circular pulsed-field ablation in preclinical models?
Does stable catheter-tissue contact and increased application count improve lesion depth during circular pulsed-field ablation in preclinical models?
Stable catheter-tissue contact and increased application counts are critical for maximizing lesion depth during circular pulsed-field ablation, whereas the magnitude of contact force has minimal impact.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports prioritizing stable catheter contact during PFA; hypothesis-generating for impact on clinical efficacy in AF ablation.
Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel nonthermal therapy for cardiac arrhythmias. The influence of contact force (CF), contact status, and application count on lesion characteristics in bipolar biphasic circular PFA remains uncertain. This study investigated lesion dimensions and acute histopathological changes using potato and porcine myocardial models. PFA was delivered in potato models under non-contact conditions or stratified contact forces (0–25 g, 25–50 g, > 50 g; 5 applications each). Porcine myocardium lesions were created with 1, 3, or 5 applications under contact or non-contact. Contact conditions yielded deeper lesions than non-contact in potato models (p < 0.001), with no significant differences among CF subgroups. In porcine myocardium, contact lesions were significantly deeper after three (4.82 ± 0.91 mm vs. 3.33 ± 0.74 mm; p < 0.05) and five applications (5.80 ± 0.49 mm vs. 3.55 ± 0.45 mm; p < 0.001) compared to non-contact. Lesion width was unaffected by contact status or application number. Histology demonstrated contraction-band necrosis, neutrophilic infiltration, edema, and hemorrhage with preserved microvasculature; these changes were more pronounced under contact. In the phantom model, lesion dimensions were predominantly governed by contact stability rather than contact force magnitude. In vivo validation confirmed that maintaining stable contact is a prerequisite for effective lesion formation. Furthermore, increasing the number of applications augmented lesion depth in porcine myocardium, while width remained stable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2026) studied Cardiac arrhythmias (experimental model) (n=3). Bipolar biphasic circular Pulsed-Field Ablation (PFA) under contact conditions vs. PFA under non-contact conditions was evaluated on Lesion depth after 5 applications in porcine myocardium (mm) (p=<0.001). Pulsed-field ablation under contact conditions produced significantly deeper myocardial lesions compared to non-contact conditions after five applications (5.80 mm vs 3.55 mm).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: