Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ESR dating investigates the age of barite samples, indicating 228Ra contribution is negligible for dating accuracy.
The conventional ESR ages of two barite samples, in which ²²⁸Ra was not detected, were 973 and 357 years. After correction for the possible contribution of extinct ²²⁸Ra and its daughters, the age differences were only about 2 years. This indicates that the contribution of ²²⁸Ra is negligible in practice unless the initial ²²⁸Ra/²²⁶Ra ratio in particularly high. However, it is still necessary to investigate further if the fluid ratio may vary spatially or temporally.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toyoda et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: