Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article explores the concept of the ordinary animal in radical environmental humanities, suggesting new ways of thinking and acting.
This article seeks to extend Patricia MacCormack?s abolitionist a human project through Fran?ois Laruelle?s non-philosophy. To this end, it takes the ?animal remainder? produced by Laruelle?s dualysis of the ?rational animal? and rethinks it as radical immanence. Once doubly dualyzed, this animal remainder becomes the ordinary animal, in contrast to the exceptional animality produced within environmental humanities through the ontologic of predication. The article pursues three aims. First, it critically examines Laruelle?s account of the animal, which is still an underexplored aspect of his non-philosophical project. Second, it exposes the presuppositions within environmental humanities that sustain the ontico-ontological positioning of the animal as exceptional. Finally, it advances the notion of radical environmental humanities as a critical, philo-fictional practice informed by non-philosophy. The non-philosophical ordinary animal demands a restructuring of ways of thinking, feeling, and acting through gnosis, iconoclasm, and augury, as part of its perpetual struggle against the production of beasts of ontological burden.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrija Filipović (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: