Numerical models reveal controls on slab stagnation depths in the mantle, suggesting a new understanding of mid-mantle viscosity.
Seismic tomography reveals widespread stagnant slabs, mainly at depths of ~ 660 and ~ 1000 km, yet a unified explanation for both depths remains lacking. Here we use numerical models that self-consistently track grain-size evolution to investigate controls on slab stagnation depth. Our models show that fossil slabs can induce mantle downwelling that crosses the 660-km discontinuity, where phase-transition-induced grain-size reduction generates a localized low-viscosity zone (LVZ) between 660 and 1000 km depths. Under slow trench retreat and in the presence of an LVZ, slabs penetrate the 660 km discontinuity and stagnate near ~ 1000 km depth. Conversely, under fast trench retreat or without an LVZ, slabs stagnate near ~ 660 km depth or penetrate into the deep mantle. These results highlight sporadic LVZs as a mechanism for the two stagnation depths and imply laterally inhomogeneous mid-mantle viscosity structure driven by sinking fossil slabs from past subduction. Numerical models with evolving grain size suggest a laterally inhomogeneous viscosity layer below 660 km depth, with sporadic low viscosity zones induced by fossil slabs, explaining slab stagnation at around 1000 km depth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: