PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 5, 2026PLoS ONE2 citationsOpen Access

Real-world clinical effectiveness of trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole for primary prophylaxis of pneumocystis pneumonia in non-hodgkin lymphoma patients treated with rituximab

View Full Paper
PCPatcharaporn CharoenritPNPimjai NiparuckPRPorpon Rotjanapan

Key Points

  • This research aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis for PJP in patients undergoing rituximab treatment.
  • Retrospective analysis of 690 non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients receiving rituximab from 2013 to 2022.
  • Evaluation of different TMP/SMX dosing regimens over a one-year period.
  • Comparison of PJP incidence between patients receiving prophylaxis and those not receiving it.
  • PJP incidence was 1% in the prophylaxis group compared to 5.8% in the non-prophylaxis group.
  • The hazard ratio for developing PJP with prophylaxis was 0.105, indicating significant protection.
  • No PJP cases occurred with standard prophylaxis, but there were cases with higher dosing regimens.

Abstract

There are no definitive clinical practice guidelines regarding the necessity and dosage of trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) prophylaxis for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) in individuals undergoing rituximab therapy. This retrospective study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of various TMP–SMX prophylactic dosing regimens over a 1-year period in 690 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with rituximab at a university hospital in Thailand from 2013 to 2022. Out of these patients, 622 (90.1%) received TMP/SMX, with a mean duration of prophylaxis of 265.7 days (SD 85.66). The overall incidence of PJP was 1% (7 patients), which was significantly higher in the non-prophylaxis group (5.8%, 4 patients) compared to the prophylaxis group (0.6%, 3 patients). No cases of PJP occurred among those receiving standard prophylaxis or a single-strength tablet every other day, three times a week. However, instances in the prophylaxis cohort were reported in patients who took two single-strength tablets twice daily, twice a week. Prophylaxis resulted in a significant reduction in the one-year incidence of PJP, with a hazard ratio of 0.105 (95% CI: 0.023–0.469). Mild adverse reactions were noted in 3.05% of patients, all of whom recovered. These findings suggest that TMP/SMX prophylaxis was associated with a lower incidence of PJP and was well tolerated. Future studies should explore optimal dosing strategies while considering patient selection bias and concurrent immunosuppressive therapy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Charoenrit et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a91e65d6127c7a504c2539https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344273
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper