Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article demonstrates that customary Indigenous governments can foster greater community participation, suggesting the need for legal reform in Canada.
Many Indigenous nations in the settler state of Canada have two governments: elective band councils and a customary leadership not subject to regular elections. When these groups struggle for authority, outsiders often side with the band councils on the assumption that elections are necessary for a government to be democratic. But this assumption reflects an unwarranted electoral bias. In fact, non-elective customary governments can be more democratic than elected band councils. As we show, customary governments sometimes draw wider participation from Indigenous communities, and they can create responsiveness through non-electoral mechanisms that promote voice and exit. This gives Canada a democratic reason to promote Indigenous democratic innovation through policy and legal reforms that facilitate state recognition of customary governments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sherwin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: