Key result
Implicit Neural Representation effectively compensates for cardiac and respiratory motion in free-breathing 3D cardiac QSM.
Why the study?
Current cardiac MRI methods for non-invasive quantification of differential blood oxygenation suffer from long acquisition times and reduced robustness.
Does implicit neural representation (INR) learned motion compensation improve image quality and provide equivalent ΔSO2 measurements compared to navigator-gated Cartesian acquisition in free-breathing cardiac QSM?
Does implicit neural representation (INR) learned motion compensation improve image quality and provide equivalent ΔSO2 measurements compared to navigator-gated Cartesian acquisition in free-breathing cardiac QSM?
Implicit neural representation learning is a feasible method for motion compensation in free-breathing 3D cardiac QSM, offering superior image quality and equivalent oxygenation measurements compared to standard Cartesian acquisition.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Improves cardiac QSM access for patients unable to breath-hold; extends INR to 3D free-breathing motion compensation.
Purpose Differential blood oxygenation between the right and left heart (ΔSO 2 ) is an indicator of cardiovascular function currently assessed in clinical practice by invasive right heart catheterization. Cardiac MRI can non‐invasively quantify ΔSO 2 with quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) using a prospective navigator gated 3D cartesian acquisition. However, this method suffers from long acquisition time and reduced robustness. Here, a free‐breathing cardiac QSM using spiral sampling and deep learning motion compensation is proposed. Methods A retrospective self‐gated stack‐of‐spirals multi‐echo gradient echo sequence is combined with implicit neural representation (INR) learning for image reconstruction. The self‐gating signals measure superior–inferior cardiac and respiratory motion thus allowing k‐space binning. Using a physics‐informed signal model and the spatiotemporal coordinate input, INR infers motion fields as well as motion‐corrected water, fat, and field maps. Then, QSM and ΔSO 2 are accordingly computed. Data were acquired in 10 healthy subjects. For comparison, a free‐breathing prospective navigator ECG‐triggered Cartesian acquisition (NAV) was performed. Results INR reconstructed motion‐corrected water, fat, R2* and field maps were successfully obtained in all subjects. INR‐QSM showed superior image quality ( p = 0.0067) and equivalent ΔSO 2 measurement in the heart ( r = 0.74, p < 0.001; 1.07% ± 3.52% bias/limits of agreement) compared to the reference NAV‐QSM. Conclusion This study demonstrated the feasibility of INR for compensation of cardiac and respiratory motion in free‐breathing 3D cardiac QSM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied Healthy (n=10). Free-breathing cardiac QSM using spiral sampling and implicit neural representation (INR) learning vs. Free-breathing prospective navigator ECG-triggered Cartesian acquisition (NAV) was evaluated on Image quality and ΔSO2 measurement in the heart (r = 0.74, p=<0.001). Implicit neural representation for free-breathing 3D cardiac QSM showed superior image quality (p=0.0067) and equivalent ΔSO2 measurement (r=0.74, p<0.001) compared to reference NAV-QSM.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: