This study examines how fiscal governance structures influence corporate environmental performance by exploiting China’s 2003 tax delegation reform as a quasi-natural experiment. The reform transferred corporate income tax collection authority from locally-governed Local Tax Bureaus (LTBs) to centrally-managed State Tax Bureaus (STBs) based on a firm registration date cutoff of January 1, 2002. Using a Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD) with micro-level panel data from Chinese manufacturing firms (2004-2008), we identify the causal impact of tax administration assignment on firm-level energy efficiency, measured as output per unit of energy consumed. Our findings reveal that firms under LTB administration exhibit 8-12% higher energy efficiency compared to comparable firms under STB administration. This effect persists across multiple robustness checks, including alternative bandwidth specifications, placebo tests using unaffected firms, and alternative energy efficiency measures. Mechanism analysis demonstrates that the energy efficiency gains stem from three primary channels: (1) relaxed financial constraints enabling greater investment capacity, (2) transition toward cleaner energy sources with reduced coal dependency, and (3) increased adoption of energy-saving technologies and green innovation. These effects are particularly pronounced among financially constrained firms, non-exporters, and firms in regions with higher fiscal capacity or stronger environmental pressure. These results contribute to three strands of literature. First, they provide novel evidence that fiscal administrative structures—traditionally viewed as purely revenue instruments—can have substantial unintended environmental consequences. Second, they demonstrate how local fiscal flexibility may create conditions conducive to green technological upgrading by alleviating financial frictions. Third, they extend the Porter Hypothesis to the institutional level, showing that supportive governance arrangements can simultaneously enhance economic efficiency and environmental sustainability. The findings suggest that integrating environmental performance metrics into local tax administration evaluation frameworks could align fiscal incentives with sustainability objectives, offering a promising pathway for emerging economies to achieve coordinated economic and environmental goals. • LTB oversight improves firm energy efficiency by 8–12% over STB control. • Lenient tax enforcement eases financing constraints for cleaner energy adoption. • Environmental benefits are stronger in fiscally surplus or high-pressure cities. • Financing-constrained and non-exporting firms benefit most from LTB regulation. • Study links decentralized tax control to unexpected environmental improvements.
Bao et al. (2026) studied this question.