Investigates bacterial prevalence and antibiotic resistance on computer devices in a university, suggesting potential health risks.
Computer devices in university settings are frequently shared and repeatedly handled, making them potential reservoirs for pathogenic bacteria. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence, virulence determinants, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli isolated from computer devices used by staff and students at a university in Northern Thailand. A total of 400 computer devices were sampled, with each device defined as a single sampling unit comprising both the keyboard and computer mouse. Bacterial identification was performed using PCR, while staphylococcal enterotoxin (se) genes and diarrheagenic E. coli (DEC)-associated virulence genes were detected by PCR. Antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed using the disk diffusion method. Overall, 74 (18.5%) S. aureus isolates and 6 (1.5%) E. coli isolates were recovered. The highest prevalence of S. aureus was observed among personal-use student computer devices (29%; p < 0.001), whereas E. coli was most frequently detected on public-use staff computer devices (4%). Among S. aureus isolates, 24.3% (18/74) carried at least one se gene, with sec being the most prevalent (13.5%). Half of the E. coli isolates harbored the astA gene. Low resistance rates (<10%) were observed among S. aureus; however, four isolates (5.4%) were classified as MRSA, three of which exhibited multidrug resistance. All E. coli isolates were resistant to ampicillin, and 50% displayed multidrug-resistant phenotypes. These findings suggest that computer devices can act as occasional reservoirs of potentially pathogenic and antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in university environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Upakut et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: