Comparative analysis highlights arbitrators’ roles in international arbitration, indicating a need for improved judicial cooperation.
parallel proceedings, which arise when identical or related disputes are submitted to multiple judicial or arbitral forums, thereby threatening the stability of international commercial arbitration. The research examines the Iraqi legal framework and judicial practice, and provides a comparative analysis of key international approaches, including those of Egypt, France, and England. Using an analytical and comparative methodology supported by legislative texts, case law, and contemporary scholarly opinions, the study proposes practical recommendations to reinforce arbitrators’ independence and strengthen judicial–arbitral cooperation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdullah Karim Abbas (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: