Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Develops a risk model for acute rejection in liver transplantation, indicating improved patient monitoring for better outcomes.
Introduction Acute cellular rejection (ACR) is a T cell-driven event in liver transplantation. Current monitoring relies on detecting graft injury, lacking tools for pre-emptive risk assessment based on the patient’s real-time immune status. Methods We developed an immunopharmacologic risk model in a retrospective cohort of 98 liver transplant recipients (18 with biopsy-proven ACR). The model integrated peripheral CD4+ T-cell percentage (flow cytometry) and tacrolimus trough level. Firth-penalized logistic regression was used for model development, with internal validation via bootstrapping. Results The parsimonious model, comprising only CD4+ T-cell percentage and tacrolimus level, demonstrated good discrimination (AUC 0.774, 95% CI 0.674-0.874) and calibration. Critically, lead-time analysis revealed the model provided a median warning window of 8 days (IQR: 3.5 days) prior to biochemical injury onset. It offered significant incremental value over monitoring tacrolimus alone (AUC 0.774 vs. 0.694, ΔAUC=0.080, p=0.007) or CD4+ T cells alone (AUC 0.774 vs. 0.733, ΔAUC=0.041, p=0.014). Conclusion We identify and validate a novel, clinically actionable immunopharmacologic biomarker panel for ACR. This model enables pre-emptive risk stratification by capturing the high-risk confluence of immune activation and subtherapeutic immunosuppression, paving the way for personalized immunotherapy in transplant recipients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: