Zooarchaeological analysis reveals differentiated pig management in ancient China, suggesting complex subsistence strategies.
• Zooarchaeological and isotopic data were integrated at Wangjiagang (770–221 BCE). • Domestic pig dominance was identified using mortality and skeletal indicators. • Two pig δ 13 C clusters indicate high-input C4 and low-input C3 feeding pathways. • Comparative data reveal regional variability in Zhou-period pig management. • Pigs supplied most biomass, with cervid hunting remaining supplementary. This study integrates zooarchaeological analysis, stable isotope evidence, and quantitative meat-yield estimation to reconstruct differentiated pig management and animal exploitation at the Eastern Zhou site of Wangjiagang in the eastern Taihang foothills (northern China). Zooarchaeological indicators-taxonomic abundance, mortality profiles, and epiphyseal fusion—suggest a suid assemblage dominated by domestic pigs managed primarily for meat. Pig collagen isotopes show marked inter-individual δ 13 C variability with two clusters: a C 4 -enriched group consistent with pen/yard feeding on millet byproducts and household waste, and a C 3 -dominated group indicating a lower-input pathway relying mainly on C 3 resources (e.g., local forage and/or C 3 -dominated household waste). Historical and archaeological records document pig-keeping practices from penning to outdoor keeping in northern China, offering a broader interpretive framework for diversified management. Meat-yield estimates indicate domestic pigs provided the largest share of mammalian biomass (≈58%), while wild cervids contributed ∼ 26% as supplementary resources. Together, these results point to a mixed economy integrating millet agriculture, pig management, and opportunistic hunting, and show how pig isotope variability can illuminate adaptation in ecotonal landscapes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: