PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2026Water-Energy Nexus0 citationsOpen Access

Quantitative analysis of carbon emissions and material flow of a full-scale wastewater treatment plant with AAO process

View Full Paper
XZXiangyu ZhangEast China Normal UniversityCYChenxi YuTianjin University of Traditional Chinese MedicineHZHongyang ZhuLinyi University

Key Points

  • To analyze carbon emissions and material flow in a full-scale wastewater treatment plant using AAO process and optimize operations using machine learning.
  • Conducted material flow analysis to quantify pollutant removal rates.
  • Employed machine learning for optimization of carbon emissions and operational costs.
  • Analyzed contributions of different tanks to carbon emissions and electricity consumption.
  • Proposed a multi-algae system for nutrient recovery and carbon reduction.
  • Achieved a 30% reduction in carbon emissions and 33% savings in operating costs.
  • Identified anaerobic tank as the primary source of direct emissions from nitrous oxide and methane.
  • Quantified the removal effectiveness for COD, TN, and TP during different treatment phases.

Abstract

• Anaerobic tank was identified as the primary direct emission source in AAO process. • Strong correlations were found between N 2 O, CH 4 emissions and influent pollutants. • Machine learning optimization achieved 30% carbon reduction and 33% cost savings. • Material flow analysis quantified the removal of COD, TN, and TP in each unit. • Multi-algae system was proposed for carbon reduction and nutrient recovery. Given the increasing attention in achieving carbon neutrality, carbon emissions and material flow are critical for the sustainability of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). This research firstly integrated carbon emission accounting, material flow analysis (MFA), and machine learning-based optimization to characterize a full-scale WWTP with the anaerobic-anoxic-oxic process. It was found that the annual carbon emission intensity was 0.734±0.069 kgCO 2 ·m -3 , with direct and indirect emissions contributing 36.8% and 63.2%, respectively. Notably, the anaerobic tank was identified as the primary source of direct emissions from nitrous oxide and methane production, while the aerobic tank was the largest contributor of indirect emissions, accounting for about 40% of the total electricity consumption. Additionally, nitrogen and organic load had a significant impact on direct emissions, while the poly aluminum chloride dosage had the largest effect on chemical consumption-related carbon emissions (r=0.853, p<0.001). Innovatively, machine learning was employed to predict the full-process carbon emissions of the plant and then the differential evolution algorithm was used to optimize the operation of the plant, resulting in 30.36% reduction of carbon emissions, 33.19% reduction of operating costs and 25.21% reductions of pollutants for per ton of water. MFA revealed distinct removal patterns for the three pollutants: (1) chemical oxygen demand—12.49% removed in pretreatment, 81.34% in biological treatment, with relatively low carbon recovery potential; (2) total nitrogen—15.35% removed in pretreatment, 62.00% in biological treatment, and 18.26% discharged with effluent; (3) total phosphorus—80.94% removed in the aerobic tank through polyphosphate-accumulating organisms with an additional 18.76% removed by coagulants in sedimentation, indicating high phosphorus recovery potential through sludge. Based on these material flow characteristics showing high nitrogen and phosphorus recovery potential, a multi-algae system composed of Spirulina and freshwater Chlorella with intelligent control was proposed in an embedded algal pond to maximize nitrogen and phosphorus recovery while serving as a carbon sink, thereby reducing energy consumption and chemical usage. In summary, this study provides valuable insights for carbon reduction, pollution mitigation, and resource recovery in urban WWTPs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa6ee2531e4c4a9ff59159https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wen.2026.02.002
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluation of the spatial and temporal variability of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions at two different full-scale aerobic treatment systems used in the post-treatment of UASB effluents in Brazil2020 · 13 citations
  2. 2The comparison of performances of a sewage treatment system before and after implementing the cleaner production measure2014 · 38 citations
  3. 3Prediction of energy consumption and evaluation of affecting factors in a full-scale WWTP using a machine learning approach2021 · 114 citations
  4. 4Emissão de óxido nitroso de estação de tratamento de esgoto de lodos ativados por aeração prolongada - estudo preliminar2010 · 7 citations
  5. 5Production of nitrogen oxide and dinitrogen oxide by autotrophic nitrifiers2000 · 295 citations