Key result
High AF burden linked to ~63% higher in-hospital mortality in critically ill ICU patients.
Why the study?
Research on AF burden as a dynamic, real-time predictor of adverse outcomes in critically ill patients is lacking.
Does high atrial fibrillation burden increase in-hospital mortality in critically ill adult ICU patients?
Does high atrial fibrillation burden increase in-hospital mortality in critically ill adult ICU patients?
Deep learning-derived high atrial fibrillation burden (≥7.0%) is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in critically ill ICU patients.
Supports AF burden assessment for prognostication in critically ill patients; extends evidence but remains hypothesis-generating for interventional trials.
Despite its clinical significance, research on atrial fibrillation (AF) burden as a dynamic, real-time predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with critical illness is lacking. This study examined the association between high AF burden and in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients, using intensive care unit (ICU) data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III; 2001–2012) and Yongin Severance Hospital (2021–2023). Electrocardiogram waveform data were analyzed using deep learning models to calculate AF burden. Adult ICU patients were included, with exclusion of those aged ≥90 years and those with an AF burden >0.9. AF burden was defined as the ratio of AF waveforms to total waveforms during ICU admission, with a high burden defined as ≥7.0%. Logistic regression and machine learning models were employed to assess the association between AF burden and in-hospital mortality, as well as to evaluate the contribution of AF burden to mortality prediction. From the MIMIC-III database, 7,734 patients were included: 5,734 (74.1%) had a low AF burden (median, 0.3%) and 2,000 (25.9%) had a high AF burden (median, 22.5%). High AF burden was associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality (18.1% vs. 8.6%, P < 0.001) and was identified as an independent risk factor (adjusted odds ratio, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.36–1.95; P < 0.001). Machine learning models demonstrated that AF burden is a significant contributor to mortality prediction, with an area under the curve of 0.86. AF burden may serve as a dynamic marker for real-time alerts of clinical deterioration and for risk stratification in critically ill patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question. High AF burden (≥7.0%) was independently associated with higher in-hospital mortality (18.1% vs 8.6%, adjusted OR 1.63) in critically ill ICU patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: