PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2026Fermentation0 citationsOpen Access

Metabolic Flux Analysis of Escherichia coli Based on Kinetic Model and Genome-Scale Metabolic Network Model

View Full Paper
ZGZhiren GanJJJingyan JiangMZMengxuan Zhou

Key Points

  • The research aims to enhance fermentation processes by differentiating between viable and dead cells using a combination of kinetic models and GSMM.
  • Utilized E. coli BL21(DE3) as a model organism for flux analysis.
  • Developed a strategy integrating cell kinetics with genome-scale metabolic network models.
  • Employed the gradient descent algorithm for parameter estimation, optimizing glucose consumption predictions.
  • Utilized Quadratic Programming-based parsimonious Flux Balance Analysis for quantifying intracellular fluxes.
  • Successfully differentiated viable from dead cells during fermentation.
  • Achieved a maximum specific growth rate of 0.6457 in Batch D with a gradient-increasing feeding strategy.
  • Established strong correlations between metabolic reaction fluxes and feeding strategies.

Abstract

The application of Genome-Scale Metabolic Network Models (GSMM) in fermentation optimization is hampered by challenges in differentiating viable from dead cells and parameter distortion induced by conventional detection methods. Using E. coli BL21(DE3) as the model organism, this study developed a flux analysis strategy that couples cell kinetics with GSMM. Key parameters were estimated using the gradient descent algorithm, thereby enabling precise prediction of viable cell concentration and glucose consumption dynamics. Integrating this with the Quadratic Programming-based parsimonious Flux Balance Analysis (QP-pFBA) algorithm, intracellular metabolic reaction fluxes were quantified. Results demonstrated that the model can effectively differentiate viable from dead cells; Batch D, adopting the gradient-increasing feeding strategy, achieved the maximum specific growth rate (μmax) of 0.6457, the highest among the four batches. Moreover, key metabolic reaction fluxes were highly correlated with the feeding strategy. This framework forgoes specialized, high-cost equipment and offers robust cross-strain/process adaptability, thereby greatly advancing GSMM utility. It provides a powerful tool for precise fermentation control and accelerates the shift toward data-driven biomanufacturing.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa701a531e4c4a9ff598c4https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12030134
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Enhancing the accuracy of genome-scale metabolic models with kinetic information2024
  2. 2A compact model of Escherichia coli core and biosynthetic metabolism2025
  3. 3Quantitative differences in anaerobic growth and metabolism of three different E. coli strains using 13C-Metabolic Flux Analysis2024
  4. 4CFSA: Comparative flux sampling analysis as a guide for strain design2024 · 6 citations
  5. 5A compact model of Escherichia coli core and biosynthetic metabolism2024 · 4 citations