Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This thesis examines communication pattern classification in graph networks, revealing effective modeling techniques.
Of primary interest in this thesis is the general supervised learning problem of studying communication patterns and classifying data on graph networks. Consider the nodes on a graph as communicators, and edges on this graph as messages sent/received between unique nodes. We describe this graph data using summarized features derived from our graph for each node. We then consider 2-class classification, using our features to determine whether or not a node belongs to some class of interest. We consider several sub-problems, including feature selection, and "unbalanced" 2-class classification, in which one rare class is of special interest. A concrete example using e-mails related to the Enron scandal will be used to highlight these techniques. Our results show that a handful of features is enough to provide adequate models and that techniques such as random forests and boosted trees prove to be good classifiers, as measured by misclassification rate. A second dataset corresponding to the unbalanced case is also considered. Again, a small number of features could be used to produce accurate predictions, as measured by the area under a lift curve.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Erika Shun-Mee Nahm (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: