Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative analysis reveals how neighbourhood renovations influence residents' well-being in urban versus suburban settings, suggesting tailored strategies.
Against the backdrop of national urban renewal strategies, the renovation of old residential neighbourhoods has entered a phase of coordinated spatial-social governance. However, existing research has insufficiently analysed the associative mechanisms linking renovation pathways, social resilience, and well-being under varying locational conditions. This study examines two Jinan neighbourhoods: Leshan Community (culturally-rich) in the city centre and Shandong University's Fifth Dormitory (service-deprived periphery) in the suburbs. Employing comparative case analysis, questionnaire surveys and in-depth interviews, it constructs a "three-dimensional social resilience (organisational, economic, ecological) + six-dimensional well-being" assessment framework to explore the transmission logic: "location disparity → renovation pathway → social resilience → perceived well-being". Findings reveal that inner-city neighbourhoods enhance cultural resilience through "cultural revitalisation renovation", elevating residents' cultural identity-based well-being; while suburban neighbourhoods bolster service resilience via "service supplementation renovation", improving service convenience-based well-being. Consequently, location-adaptive renovation strategies are proposed, providing theoretical underpinnings and practical guidance for targeted renewal of similar ageing neighbourhoods in northern Chinese cities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng Ziyi (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: