Pilot randomized trial tests a collaborative care model, finding challenges in improving patient outcomes in severe liver disease.
Objectives: Patients with decompensated cirrhosis have a high symptom burden and poor outcomes. Collaborative care models that provide coordinated, personalized care could improve outcomes. In this pilot randomized trial, we tested a cirrhosis-centric collaborative care model: the Cirrhosis Medical Home (CMH). Methods: A single-center pilot randomized trial enrolling 40 hospitalized adults with decompensated cirrhosis randomized 1:1 to CMH or usual care. CMH involved 6 months of post-discharge individualized care. Primary outcomes were feasibility-based (enrollment, retention, data completeness). Secondary outcomes at 3 and 6 months included quality of life (SF-36) and healthcare utilization. Results: Of 205 patients screened, 40 were enrolled. Of the 20 patients randomized to CMH, 13 received post-discharge CMH follow-up. At 3 months, 19 died or had a transplant, 9 were lost to follow-up, and 12 completed the SF-36. At 6 months, an additional 4 died or were lost to follow-up, and 8 completed the SF-36. In intention-to-treat analysis at 3 months, CMH did not improve quality of life. In per-protocol analysis at 3 months, CMH improved physical functioning (delta +15 vs –10, p=0.015), energy/fatigue (+20 vs –5, p=0.02), and physical component score (+5.5 vs –5.0, p=0.009). High mortality and readmission rates were seen in both arms but without significant differences. Conclusions: Enrollment and retention in a randomized trial of the CMH for post-hospitalization management of decompensated cirrhosis is challenging, and patient-reported outcome assessment is limited by high rates of mortality, transplant, and loss to follow-up. These data can be used to inform future design and testing of health services interventions for this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Orman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: