PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2026The Open Dentistry Journal0 citationsOpen Access

Assessment of Maxillofacial Prosthesis Knowledge and Practice Among Dental Professionals in Saudi Arabia

View Full Paper
AOAbdulmajeed OkshahADAbdulelah Ali DaghririKAKhyrat Yahya M Alameer

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the knowledge and practices regarding maxillofacial prosthesis among dental professionals in Saudi Arabia.
  • Conducted an online questionnaire with 18 items for dental professionals.
  • Participants included final-year students, interns, general practitioners, residents, and specialists.
  • Evaluated data using descriptive statistics and Chi-square analysis for associations.
  • 336 dental professionals participated in the study.
  • A significant difference was noted in knowledge so most scored well, but practice was rated as fair.
  • Only 20 participants indicated having experience with maxillofacial prosthesis, with a varied distribution across types.

Abstract

Aim This 18-item online closed questionnaire-based study aimed to evaluate and assess the level of knowledge and practices of maxillofacial prosthesis (MFP) among different dental professionals in Saudi Arabia (SA). Methods An Electronic investigation was directed to dental professionals (final-year students, interns, general practitioners, MFP residents, and specialists). Participants were invited to respond to the online forms based on their knowledge and MFP practice. The collected answers were evaluated employing descriptive statistics as values and percentages. The association among participants, knowledge, and practice was analyzed using Chi-square, with a P -value of ≤0.05 indicating statistical significance. Results 336 participants were included, with only 20 patients receiving MFP, those were 12, 3, and 5 patients who received MFP for the mandible, maxilla, and nasal MFPs, respectively. A significant difference was found between dental professional participants and MFP knowledge questions with p < 0.001, except for questions like ‘’Do you know that there is more than one type of maxillofacial prosthesis?”, ‘’How many maxillofacial specialists or consultants are in the place that you work?” and ‘’Is there interest to support and develop MFP from the Ministry of Health in the city?” with p -values of 0.104, 0.081, and 0.134, respectively. Also, a significant difference was detected between participants and their answers to most of the practice questions, with p < 0.001, except for the question related to the type of MFP they practice ( p = 0.0125). Conclusions Dental practitioners have good knowledge, but the practice of MFP is still fair. Referrals and multidisciplinary approaches for managing these patients remain poor.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Okshah et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa705a531e4c4a9ff5a120https://doi.org/10.2174/0118742106414837260111051435
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper