This conceptual analysis explores portfolio-based learning to enhance competency evaluation in Korean Medicine education, suggesting improved outcomes.
Objectives: Competency-based education (CBE) emphasizes graduates’ ability to demonstrate integrated competencies rather than performance on single high-stakes examinations. This paper aims to conceptually analyze portfolio-based learning in colleges of Korean Medicine as a process-oriented assessment infrastructure that structurally links graduation outcomes, phase outcomes, and course-level outcomes within a competency-based curriculum.Methods: Drawing on theoretical discussions of competency-based medical education and programmatic assessment, a design-oriented conceptual analysis was conducted on an Excel-based portfolio system collaboratively developed and implemented by faculty from basic sciences, clinical medicine, medical humanities, and medical education in a college of Korean Medicine. The analysis focused on the portfolio’s design logic, structural characteristics, and intended educational functions, rather than on empirical effectiveness testing.Results: The analyzed portfolio system was structured to accumulate longitudinal evidence of competency development and to support faculty coaching and committee-based holistic judgment. These features provide a mechanism for phase outcome–centered educational management and address structural limitations of assessment approaches relying on single-point confirmation of graduation outcomes.Conclusion: Portfolio-based learning can function as a core infrastructure for process-oriented assessment in competency-based Korean Medicine education. By articulating the design logic and evaluative implications of an implemented portfolio system, this design-oriented conceptual study provides a theoretical foundation for future empirical research and continuous quality improvement in curriculum management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: