PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2026JAMA Surgery5 citations

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy vs Upfront Surgery in Patients With Locally Advanced Colon Cancer

View Full Paper
LJLars Henrik JensenMKMonica L KjaerLDLaura V. Diness

Key Points

  • This trial aims to assess if neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves disease-free survival compared to upfront surgery in locally advanced colon cancer.
  • Randomized, open-label phase III trial
  • Conducted at 9 hospitals in Scandinavia
  • Involved 250 patients with locally advanced colon cancer randomized to two treatment groups
  • At 3 years, disease-free survival was 87% in the upfront surgery group and 83% in the neoadjuvant group (P = .36)
  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was safe and feasible, leading to tumor downstaging
  • Reduced need for adjuvant chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant group (59% vs 73%, P = .02)

Abstract

Importance Locally advanced colon cancer carries a high risk of recurrence. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been proposed to improve outcomes, but evidence from phase III trials remains limited. Objective To determine whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves disease-free survival (DFS) compared with upfront surgery in patients with locally advanced colon cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This randomized, open-label, phase III clinical trial conducted from October 14, 2013, to November 27, 2020, with follow-up up to 3 years for DFS took place at 9 hospitals in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. A total of 250 patients with locally advanced colon cancer staged by computed tomography, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2, and no distant metastases were enrolled. These data were analyzed from January 2024 to October 2024. Interventions Patients were randomized 1:1 to upfront surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy as indicated (n = 122) or 3 cycles of neoadjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy if indicated (n = 126). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was DFS. Secondary end points included surgical and pathological outcomes, adjuvant chemotherapy use, adverse events, quality of life, and exploratory analysis by mismatch repair (MMR) status. Results A total of 248 patients were eligible and included in analyses (median age, 66 min-max, 24-84 years; 111 women 45% and 137 men 55%). At 3 years, DFS was 87% in the upfront surgery arm and 83% in the neoadjuvant arm ( P = .36). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was feasible and safe, achieved tumor downstaging, and reduced the proportion of patients meeting criteria for adjuvant chemotherapy (upfront surgery 73% vs neoadjuvant group 59%; P = .02). Exploratory analyses suggested variation by MMR status, with DFS estimates higher after upfront surgery in patients with MMR-deficient tumors. Postoperative complications, adverse event profiles, and quality of life were comparable between groups. Conclusions and Relevance Neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not improve DFS compared with upfront surgery, establishing the NeoCol trial as negative. However, feasibility, safety, downstaging effects, reduced adjuvant chemotherapy use, and MMR subgroup findings add to evidence from other randomized trials supporting further evaluation of this strategy in individualized management of locally advanced colon cancer. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01918527

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jensen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa7087531e4c4a9ff5a709https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2026.0085
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper