Investigating social provocation in violent males with antisocial personality disorder, revealing no behavioral differences based on oxytocin effects.
<ns3:p>Background Co-operation is a core component of human social interaction. Conflict emerges when another’s unfairness is perceived and retaliation in the form of non-cooperative behaviour or retaliatory punishment may emerge. This may be particularly relevant in men with antisocial personality disorder and psychopathy, who demonstrate impulsive behaviour and low thresholds for discharge of aggression. Methods In a sample of violent male offenders with ASPD (n= 22) with (+P, n =12) and without (-P, n= 10) psychopathy, we used a paradigm of social provocation (the Social Fairness game) in conjunction with fMRI to measure behavioural and neural response to social provocation and compared this to healthy non-offenders (n=20), and investigated the effects of intranasal oxytocin (40 I.U.), which is known to modulate social behaviours, on social provocation across groups. Results Counter to predictions, those with ASPD+/-P did not significantly differ from healthy non-offenders at the behavioural or neural level. Conclusions We discuss the potential explanations for these findings and our conclusion that this experiment has failed to provide a satisfactory model of social provocation in ASPD+/-P with which to test decisions to co-operate or retaliate, or oxytocin’s effects thereon.</ns3:p>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tully et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: