Cross-sectional analysis identifies RSV incidence and compares diagnostic methods in young children, suggesting improved testing needed.
Objectives: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), an enveloped single-stranded ribonucleic acid virus with two subgroups (RSV A and B), is a major cause of acute lower respiratory tract infections (ALRTI) in young children. This study assessed RSV incidence, risk factors, and compared diagnostic methods: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), rapid antigen test, conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and real-time PCR. Materials and Methods: A total of 104 nasopharyngeal and blood samples were collected from infants and young children with ALRTI. RSV antigen was detected using a rapid test. Real-time PCR and conventional PCR were performed on swab specimens, along with viral culture on Vero cell lines. Statistical analysis: The Chi-square test was applied; p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Of 104 samples, 65 (62.5%) were RSV positive, and 2 (1.92%) had influenza. The male: female was 1.8:1. The mean age was 10.4 ± 12.15 months; the median was 5 months. RSV peaked from October to January. Common symptoms included tachypnea (98%), fever (85%), and cough (83%). Risk factors significantly associated with RSV were overcrowding, lack of exclusive breastfeeding, and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit admission. Detection rates were Real-time PCR (61.5%), ELISA (56.9%), conventional PCR (46.1%), and rapid test (20%). Conclusions: The variability in diagnostic performance underscores the need for sensitive and specific molecular assays for RSV detection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: