PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2026PLoS ONE0 citationsOpen Access

The frequency, risk factors and spatial distribution associated with having a diagnosis of leishmaniosis in dogs in the UK in 2019

View Full Paper
SKSimon C. KentRoyal Veterinary CollegeDODan G. O’NeillUniversity of LondonKSKim StevensRoyal Veterinary College

Key Points

  • This research aims to update knowledge on the epidemiology of leishmaniosis in the UK dog population for 2019.
  • Estimated prevalence calculated using VetCompass UK practices data for dogs in 2019.
  • Mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression assessed risk factors for leishmaniosis.
  • Spatial distribution analyzed using standardized morbidity rates and Moran’s I for spatial autocorrelation.
  • Estimated annual prevalence of leishmaniosis in dogs was 0.0434%.
  • 97.9% of cases originated from outside the UK; 60.8% were diagnosed before import.
  • Higher odds of leishmaniosis were found in males (OR 1.29) and neutered dogs (OR 6.42).
  • Certain breeds like Brittany Spaniels (OR 53.0) and Ibizan Hounds (OR 43.8) had much higher odds compared to crossbreeds.
  • Spatial analysis showed more cases in southern England than expected by chance.

Abstract

Background Leishmaniosis in dogs is an important zoonotic disease, endemic in southern Europe but is increasingly being recorded in other parts of Europe including the UK. This study aimed to update the epidemiological knowledge of leishmaniosis in the UK dog population. Methods The estimated prevalence of leishmaniosis diagnosis in dogs under care at VetCompass UK participating practices in 2019 was calculated. Risk factor associations for leishmaniosis were investigated using mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression modelling. The spatial distribution of leishmaniosis was explored using standardised morbidity rates (SMR) at regional and county levels, and Moran’s I was used to identify significant spatial autocorrelation. Results The estimated annual prevalence was calculated as 0.0434% (95% CI 0.0427–0.0443) with 976 cases from this population of dogs (n = 2,250,741). Most of the dogs with leishmaniosis had originated from outside the UK (955/976, 97.9%) and of those, 60.8% (581) had already been diagnosed with leishmaniosis pre-import. In the risk factor analysis, the odds of leishmaniosis were higher in males (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.12–1.49) and neutered dogs (OR 6.42, 95% CI 4.43–9.29) compared to female and entire dogs, respectively. Purebreds overall had lower odds of leishmaniosis compared to crossbreeds (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.20–0.28) but there were specific breeds such as Brittany Spaniels (OR 53.0, 95% CI 25.3–111.1), Ibizan Hounds (OR 43.8, 95% CI 9.20–208.3) and English Pointers (OR 28.6, 95% CI 14.5–56.4) which had much higher odds of being a case compared to crossbreeds. Spatial analysis identified more leishmaniosis cases in southern England than were expected by random chance (SMR > 1). Conclusions This study identifies that imported animals are the commonest source of dogs having a leishmaniosis diagnosis. The breeds with very high odds for leishmaniosis may reflect selection bias towards breeds more likely to be imported, rescued or travelled from endemic areas rather than high intrinsic risk in these breeds towards leishmaniosis. These results support and update previous studies indicating that most cases are diagnosed in southern England.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kent et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa70d6531e4c4a9ff5af8ehttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0341610
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper