Purpose: The phase 2 ARROW study was designed to evaluate radioligand therapy with 131I-LNTH-1095, an iodine-131–labeled small molecule targeting PSMA, in combination with enzalutamide in subjects with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after progression on prior abiraterone therapy. Patients and Methods: Men ≥18 years with PSMA-positive prostate cancer (PSMA PET tracer uptake >1× liver SUVmean in all CT-measurable lesions) were randomized 2:1 to 131I-LNTH-1095 (4 cycles of 3.7 GBq/dose every 8 weeks)+enzalutamide (160 mg po qd) vs. enzalutamide alone. The primary endpoint was PSA50 response. Secondary endpoints included rPFS, ORR, OS, and safety. Results: Of 177 screened subjects, 120 were randomized (80: 131I-LNTH-1095+enzalutamide; 40: enzalutamide-monotherapy). PSA50 response was 62.9% (95% CI, 50.5-74.1) for 131I-LNTH-1095+enzalutamide vs. 31.3% (16.1-50.0) for enzalutamide alone (P=.003). Median rPFS was 14.0 months (95% CI: 8.64-18.20) for 131I-LNTH-1095+enzalutamide vs. 11.5 months (2.79–18.43) for enzalutamide alone (P=.10). Incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 65.8% for 131I-095+enzalutamide vs. 41.0% for enzalutamide-monotherapy; the most frequent TEAEs were fatigue (75.0 vs. 53.8%), nausea (59.2 vs. 33.3%), thrombocytopenia (51.3 vs. 0%), and decreased appetite (48.7 vs. 17.9%), respectively. Two deaths in the 131I-LNTH-1095+enzalutamide group were considered treatment-related. The study was not powered to detect rPFS and OS differences. Conclusions: 131I-LNTH-1095+enzalutamide was associated with a statistically significant improvement in PSA50 response compared to enzalutamide alone despite a lower dosing schedule (4 cycles of 3.7 GBq/dose every 8 weeks) than the other approved PSMA RLT agents. Grade ≥3 adverse events were more frequent with combination therapy, particularly hematologic toxicity. NCT03939689
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: