PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 20261 citationsOpen Access

A Bibliometric Analysis of Collaboration in Building Information Modeling: Emerging Dynamics and Future Trends

View Full Paper
NKNurdan KasulFHFahriye Hilal Halıcıoğlu

Key Points

  • This study aims to examine the collaboration dynamics in building information modeling (BIM) research and identify gaps related to human factors.
  • Conducted a bibliometric analysis of 1595 journal articles indexed in Web of Science and Scopus.
  • Performed qualitative content analysis of 38 purposefully selected studies.
  • Adopted a mixed-methods review design to integrate quantitative and qualitative data.
  • Found a shift from process-oriented collaboration frameworks to data-centric solutions.
  • Identified significant emphasis on technological aspects like digital twins and AI over human considerations.
  • Highlighted a human factor gap affecting organizational readiness and collaboration maturity.

Abstract

Collaboration is a cornerstone of digital transformation in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) sector. Despite widespread adoption of building information modeling (BIM), a critical “human factor gap”—the disconnect between rapid technological advancement and organizational readiness—remains largely unaddressed. This study investigates the intellectual structure of BIM collaboration research. Adopting a mixed-methods review design, it conducts a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of 1595 journal articles indexed in Web of Science and Scopus, followed by a qualitative content analysis of 38 purposefully selected studies. Findings reveal a clear shift from process-oriented collaboration frameworks toward data-centric and cyber–physical systems, including digital twins, Artificial Intelligence, and blockchain-enabled environments. However, this evolution also highlights a notable asymmetry in BIM collaboration, with technology-driven dynamics substantially outweighing human and organizational considerations. This imbalance, conceptualized as a human factor gap in thematic development observed through the bibliometric analysis, points to a potential socio-technical misalignment, in which technological topics receive more scholarly attention than organizational and human factors. Rather than framing collaboration maturity as a purely technical challenge, the study emphasizes the need for advanced digital infrastructure, human-centered governance models, organizational readiness, and socio-technical competencies. It provides analytical insights for researchers and implications for policymakers and industry stakeholders, emphasizing the necessity of integrated approaches that address both the technological and human dimensions of BIM-enabled collaboration.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kasul et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa70f8531e4c4a9ff5b39chttps://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16050986
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper