Paper VI examines governance and ethical frameworks in deterministic replay systems, suggesting operational controls for accountability.
Paper VI in the AION Foundations series. This paper defines governance constraints for deterministic replay and provenance-complete systems when replay can reconstruct mind-like interior computation. It formalizes provenance sovereignty, introduces a conservative system-mode vs mind-mode boundary, and specifies runtime controls including authority gating, bounded override, dispute pathways, and closure-ready evidence requirements. The manuscript includes enforceable REQ clauses, conformance tiers, and test-vector-driven verification guidance intended to make ethics claims operational and auditable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James Ross (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: