PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología2 citationsOpen Access

Transforming Skin Cancer Detection With AI‐Based Convolutional and Transformer Models

View Full Paper
SASelorm AdablanuUBUtpal BarmanDDDulumani Das

Key Points

  • The aim is to adapt and evaluate VINCE‐NET, a hybrid deep learning model, for melanoma classification using dermoscopic images.
  • Utilized VINCE‐NET with vision transformers and convolutional layers for model adaptation.
  • Applied Gaussian blur, normalization, and augmentation for preprocessing images.
  • Employed the HAM10000 dataset for training in a Google Colab environment.
  • Compared VINCE‐NET's performance with established models like ResNet-50 and DenseNet.
  • VINCE‐NET achieved 94.1% accuracy and 95.5% precision in melanoma classification.
  • It demonstrated a 90.4% recall and a 92.9% F1-score.
  • Received an area under the ROC curve of 0.98, indicating strong performance.
  • Showed computational efficiency while outperforming baseline models.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Skin cancer is a major cause of mortality, and early detection is vital for effective treatment. Diagnosis is challenging because of lesion variability. This study adapts VINCE‐NET, a hybrid deep‐learning model originally designed for stroke detection, to classify melanoma using dermoscopic images. Methods VINCE‐NET combines vision transformer layers for global context, convolutional neural networks for local features, and long short‐term memory for spatial sequence modeling. During preprocessing, Gaussian blur, normalization, and augmentation were applied to reduce noise and handle class imbalance. During training, the public HAM10000 dataset was used in a central processing unit‐only Google Colab environment (12.72 GB random access memory, 107.7 GB disk) with an AdamW optimizer, a batch size of 12, learning‐rate scheduling, and early stopping (patience = 50). VINCE‐NET's performance was compared with those of a convolutional neural networks, long short‐term memory, residual network with 50 layers (ResNet‐50), visual geometry group network with 16 and 19 layers (VGG‐16/19), and densely connected convolutional network with 121 and 201 layers (DenseNet‐121/201) under identical preprocessing conditions. Results VINCE‐NET achieved 94.1% accuracy, 95.5% precision, 90.4% recall, a 92.9% F1‐score, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.98 at a training time of 34,308.42 s. Benchmarks showed that VINCE‐NET outperformed baselines while being computationally efficient. Conclusion VINCE‐NET provides competitive performance for melanoma classification and feasibility in resource‐limited settings. Although promising, VINCE‐NET has not been clinically validated yet. Future work will address resolution, ablation studies, interpretability, and external validation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Adablanu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa7160531e4c4a9ff5b7b4https://doi.org/10.1002/ird3.70058
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper