Reveals that paradoxical leadership negatively affects work goal progress by reducing leader goal clarity in employees, indicating the need for clear organizational goals.
Purpose This paper aims to explore the intersection of leadership and goal-setting research, focusing on the impact of paradoxical leadership (PL) on employees’ work goal progress (WGP). Drawing on social information processing theory and goal-setting theory, our research elucidates how PL influences employees’ WGP through subordinates’ perceptions of leader goal clarity and their clear self-set goals (CSG). Design/methodology/approach The hypotheses of the study were empirically tested using a 4-wave, 2-source survey methodology involving 387 supervisor-subordinate pairs from a large Chinese tourism company. Findings The study reveals that PL negatively impacts perceived leader goal clarity and CSG, thereby impeding WGP. Additionally, it is found that clear organization-set goals (COG) can reduce the reliance on leader goal clarity and mitigate the adverse effects of PL on WGP. Originality/value This research contributes to the literature by demonstrating the potential negative consequences of PL on WGP and highlighting the importance of COG as a boundary condition. It integrates leadership and goal-setting research to provide a comprehensive understanding of the psychological processes through which leaders influence subordinates’ WGP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: