Why the study?
Concern over the usefulness of and difficulty in understanding prior pre-participation physical activity questionnaires led to the design of the SPARQ, prompting a review of the difficulty in understanding its seven questions.
What is the level of difficulty in understanding the SPARQ 2021 and its rate of identifying individuals needing medical referral for physical activity?
What is the level of difficulty in understanding the SPARQ 2021 and its rate of identifying individuals needing medical referral for physical activity?
The SPARQ 2021 requires modifications to simplify technical terms and question length to improve public comprehension for physical activity pre-participation screening.
SPARQ 2021 complexity may deter physical activity uptake; supports modifications before routine screening use.
Introduction. Singapore had previously embraced at least two types of pre-participation questionnaires for those intending to take up or enhance their level of physical activity (PA). Concern over the usefulness of and difficulty in understanding these questions led to the design of a Singapore Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (SPARQ). The primary objective of this study was to review the level of difficulty in understanding the seven SPARQ questions. Secondary objectives included the rate of identifying individuals as unfit for PA and to seek public feedback on this tool. Method. A public, cross-sectional survey on the SPARQ was carried out, obtaining participants' bio-characteristics, having them completing the SPARQ and then providing feedback on the individual questions. Results. Of the 1136 who completed the survey, 35.7% would have required referral to a medical practitioner for further evaluation before the intended PA. Significant difficulty was experienced with one question, moderate difficulty with four and only slight difficulty with the remaining two. The length of the questions and use of technical terms were matters of concern. Suggestions were provided by the participants on possible amendments to the questions. Conclusions. The very high acceptance rate of the SPARQ will need to be tempered with modifications to the questions to enhance ease of understanding and use by members of the public.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Teo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: