What does this research mean for the field?

The Pure Magnetic Space (EMP) serves as a non-metric informational substrate that requires a simultaneous co-projection towards two complementary branches to maintain global informational equilibrium. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.NOVEL_FINDING. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

What question did this study set out to answer?

The research aims to formalize a three-space model of ontology using the ICMM framework and explore the concept of co-projection.

March 7, 20261 citationsOpen Access

EMP–EEM–EED : Ontological Spaces and the co-projection principle

FCFrédéric Cordier

Key Points

The research aims to formalize a three-space model of ontology using the ICMM framework and explore the concept of co-projection.
Development of a three-space ontological architecture within the ICMM model.
Definition of a minimal 'co-projection' mechanism involving EMP, EEM, and EED.
Establishment of criteria for logical coherence and viability for derived models.
A potential imbalance in informational equilibrium is identified with unilateral projection from EMP.
Demonstration of EED as a logical consequence of informational conservation principles, compensating structures not manifested in EEM.
The framework allows for discussion and critique without confirmation bias.

Abstract

ICMM-FW-01 : This study formalizes, within the ICMM model (Information Complexe Multi-Magnétique), a three-space ontological architecture and a minimal “co-projection” mechanism. It posits the Pure Magnetic Space (EMP) as a non-metric informational substrate without fundamental temporality, and two conjugate projected spaces, the Manifested Electromagnetic Space (EEM) and the Differential Electromagnetic Space (EED). The central thesis is that a unilateral projection from EMP breaks the global informational equilibrium. Manifestation requires a simultaneous co-projection toward two complementary branches, carrying opposite deployment polarities and being structurally incompatible. EED is not introduced as an ad hoc hypothesis, but as a logical consequence of an informational conservation principle: it provides the ontological compensation of structures that are not manifested in EEM. The text explicitly separates ontological postulates from interpretations and future dynamical layers; it states internal coherence criteria and conditions for revision or rejection, in order to make the framework discussable and criticizable without confirmation bias. Scope and validation statusThis work is formulated at the ontological level and is not presented as an experimentally validated physical theory at this stage. Evaluation is framed through (i) internal logical coherence, (ii) operational viability of derived models, and (iii) indirect compatibility with empirical constraints via such derived models, with explicit refutation criteria. Replication/Collaboration Pack (non-public)A non-public Replication/Collaboration Pack (RCP) may be provided upon request, under an agreement specifying scope of use, citation obligations, sharing modalities, and where applicable co-authorship conditions. Scientific contactEmail: cordierfr@wanadoo.fr or frederic.cordier@alcahest-quantique.frORCID: 0009-0001-8661-3275Project page: https://www.alcahest-quantique.fr Recommended citationFrédéric Cordier, “EMP–EEM–EED: Ontological Spaces and the Co-Projection Principle (ICMM-FW-01)”, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.18881787.

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

View Full Paper