PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 7, 2026Discover Concrete and Cement2 citationsOpen Access

Toward resilient infrastructure: a critical review and roadmap for ultra–high–performance concrete (UHPC) design, performance and standards

AMAhmed MandorUniversité du QuébecBTBasma TaieUniversité du Québec

Key Points

  • This review aims to highlight the transformative potential of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) and to identify barriers hindering its adoption.
  • Reviewed existing literature and practices on UHPC
  • Analyzed critical gaps such as standards, guidelines, and protocols
  • Synthetized technical, economic, and environmental dimensions of UHPC use
  • Proposed a roadmap for standardization and incorporation of supplementary materials.
  • Identified gaps in standardized guidelines and durability protocols for UHPC
  • Highlighted barriers limiting UHPC adoption in construction
  • Proposed harmonized standards for better UHPC integration
  • Suggested performance-based procurement and open-access design guidelines.

Abstract

Ultra–High–Performance Concrete (UHPC) represents a transformative advancement in the construction materials, offering exceptional mechanical properties (compressive strength exceeding 150–200 MPa) and potential durability performance along with a ductile behavior, outperforming the conventional concrete. Despite its proven performance in bridges, buildings, and rehabilitation projects, UHPC adoption remains limited due to systemic barriers. Existing literature and practice reveal critical gaps including non–harmonized standards, lack of prescriptive mix design guidelines, insufficient durability protocols, and inconsistent life–cycle assessment (LCA) frameworks. These shortcomings lead to project–specific testing, elevated costs, and uncertainty in sustainability claims. This review consolidates the evolution of UHPC technology, mix design strategies, durability mechanisms, nanotechnology integration, while critically benchmarking prior reviews to expose knowledge fragmentation, and identifying the gaps and needs in the existing design and materials UHPC standards. Unlike previous review studies, this work synthesizes technical, economic, and environmental dimensions, highlighting interdependences between curing regimes, embodied energy, and cost implications. To overcome adoption barriers, the authors propose a roadmap prioritizing global harmonization of standards, open-access mix design guidelines incorporating regional supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) and recycled fine aggregates, standardized LCA templates, and performance–based procurement practices. This integrated approach aims to reduce uncertainty, foster innovation, and position UHPC as a mainstream solution for resilient and sustainable infrastructure.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mandor et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69abc0b85af8044f7a4e96c2https://doi.org/10.1007/s44416-026-00047-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper