Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This research compares a blended learning approach to traditional methods, indicating its positive effects on student motivation.
Although motivation is one of several factors supporting that support effective learning, it can be constrained in traditional chemistry laboratory courses that follow a cookbook approach. To address this issue, a new chemistry laboratory course was designed, based on research-based blended learning and Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience principles (RBBL-CURE). The course was grounded in evidence-based recommendations and explicitly structured according to the MUSIC (eMpowerment, Usefulness, Success, Interest, Caring) model of motivation introduced by Jones in 2009. Students experienced both the RBBL-CURE and traditional laboratory work (TLW) format, allowing within-student comparisons of motivation. Student motivation was assessed using the MUSIC model inventory across its five components. Compared to TLW, the RBBL-CURE format led to significant increases in empowerment (p < 0.001), interest (p = 0.04), and caring (p < 0.001), while maintaining high scores for usefulness and success. The results of this study suggest that RBBL-CURE laboratory courses can offer highly motivating experiences and may, in turn, foster student engagement, with important implications for instructional design in laboratory-based science education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Piard et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: