Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Open-label trial evaluates efficacy and safety of DNV3, toripalimab, and chemotherapy in advanced melanoma, indicating a promising treatment for refractory cases.
Despite the remarkable therapeutic advances achieved with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced melanoma, treatment options remain limited for patients with refractory subtypes. This study evaluated a novel combination of DNV3 (anti-LAG-3), toripalimab (anti-PD-1), and chemotherapy (nab-paclitaxel/cisplatin) in 27 Asian patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma (77.8% [21/27] previously treated with anti-PD-[L]1 and 22.2% [6/27] treatment-naïve mucosal melanoma; subtypes: 13 mucosal, 6 acral, 5 cutaneous, and 3 of unknown primary origin). The regimen achieved an overall response rate (ORR) of 44.4%, which was further elevated to 54.5% in the subgroup of 11 patients with hepatic metastases. Notably, it also demonstrated substantial efficacy in anti-PD-(L)1-resistant cases, with a 42.9% ORR and a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 7.36 months. Among treatment-naïve mucosal melanoma, the ORR reached 50%. At data cutoff, median overall survival remained unreached in all cohorts. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events initially occurred in 55.6% of participants; subsequent dose modification of nab-paclitaxel (from 260 mg/m² to 200 mg/m²) improved tolerability, reducing the incidence of grade ≥3 events to 22.2%. Immune-related toxicities (grade 3-4, 22.2%) were clinically manageable. Therefore, the combination of LAG-3/PD-1 blockade and chemotherapy demonstrated promising efficacy, notably in treatment-naïve mucosal melanoma with liver metastases. (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry number, ChiCTR2400079543).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: