PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 7, 2026Nature6 citationsOpen Access

Homologous recombination deficiency and hemizygosity drive resistance in breast cancer

ASAnton SafonovMLMinna LeeDBDavid N. Brown

Key Points

  • The research aims to define how germline and somatic alterations influence resistance in breast cancer.
  • Integrated analysis of over 5,800 breast cancer patients
  • Assessment of germline pathogenic variants and their impact on tumour evolution
  • Comparison of responses to CDK4/6 inhibitors and PARP inhibitors in preclinical models
  • Evaluation of RB1 alterations in relation to treatment outcomes
  • Germline BRCA2 alterations increase the risk of acquiring RB1 loss-of-function mutations
  • RB1 hemizygosity lowers the barrier to biallelic inactivation and enhances resistance
  • CDK4/6 inhibitors show poor effectiveness in gBRCA2-associated tumours
  • PARP inhibition demonstrates superior performance compared to CDK4/6 inhibitors in overcoming resistance

Abstract

The co-occurrence of germline and somatic oncogenic alterations is frequently observed in breast cancer, yet their combined influence on tumour evolution and therapy resistance remains poorly defined. Through an integrated clinicogenomic analysis of more than 5,800 patients, we show that germline (g) pathogenic variants dictate the evolutionary trajectory of acquired resistance. We specifically find that gBRCA2-associated tumours are uniquely predisposed to develop acquired RB1 loss-of-function alterations, resulting in poor outcomes on standard-of-care frontline CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) combinations. This vulnerability is driven by a dual mechanism: baseline RB1 hemizygosity (heterozygous loss resulting in a single functional RB1 allele), which lowers the evolutionary barrier to biallelic inactivation, and ongoing homologous recombination deficiency, which promotes acquisition of RB1 loss-of-function alterations under the selective pressure of CDK4/6i. Preclinical models from gBRCA2 carriers showed near-uniform resistance to CDK4/6i, with consistent post-treatment Rb loss. Across multiple independent models and in our clinical data, PARP inhibition consistently outperformed CDK4/6i. Our findings suggest that prioritizing PARP inhibition in gBRCA2 carriers may intercept RB1-loss trajectories and delay resistance. More broadly, we establish a predictive framework for forecasting drug-resistant trajectories based on pre-treatment allelic configuration and mutational signatures.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Safonov et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69abc1535af8044f7a4e9d63https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10197-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Shaping CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance: BRCA2 germline alterations bias towards RB1 inactivation.2026
  2. 2Impact of homologous recombination deficiency on CDK4/6 inhibitor sensitivity in HR+/HER2-breast cancer2025
  3. 3Germline BRCA2 mutations foster resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer2026
  4. 4Comparative analysis of distinct genomic landscapes in young-onset gBRCA1/2 breast cancer.2026
  5. 5Tumor suppressor heterozygosity and homologous recombination deficiency mediate resistance to front-line therapy in breast cancer2024 · 10 citations