Key result
Strong CYP2C19-inhibiting PPIs show no increase in MACE risk with clopidogrel vs weak inhibitors.
Why the study?
Does concomitant use of weak or non-CYP2C19-inhibiting proton pump inhibitors prevent major adverse cardiovascular events in patients receiving clopidogrel compared to strong CYP2C19-inhibiting proton pump inhibitors?
Cohort (n=332,010)
Yes
Does concomitant use of weak or non-CYP2C19-inhibiting proton pump inhibitors prevent major adverse cardiovascular events in patients receiving clopidogrel compared to strong CYP2C19-inhibiting proton pump inhibitors?
Hazard Ratio: 1 (95% CI 0.79–1.26)
Absolute Event Rate: 17.63% vs 16.82%
Concomitant use of clopidogrel and strong CYP2C19-inhibiting proton pump inhibitors does not increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared to weak or non-inhibiting agents, suggesting pharmacokinetic interactions may not translate to clinically significant harm.
BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may potentially reduce clopidogrel's antiplatelet effect and increase cardiovascular risk. The degree of CYP (cytochrome P450) 2C19 inhibition varies among PPIs. Few studies have evaluated individual PPIs by CYP2C19 inhibition strength across countries. This study aimed to compare the incidence of cardiovascular events between strong CYP2C19-inhibiting potency and weak CYP2C19-inhibiting potency (weak or non-CYP2C19-inhibiting PPIs) in patients receiving clopidogrel. METHODS: We conducted an international observational cohort study using 14 databases from the United States, South Korea, and Taiwan. We included patients aged ≥18 years who received clopidogrel with PPIs from 1985 to 2023. PPIs were classified into strong CYP2C19-inhibiting PPIs and weak or non-CYP2C19-inhibiting PPIs based on CYP2C19 inhibition. We compared the hazard ratios and 95% CIs for major adverse cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular mortality, using the Cox proportional hazards model after 1:1 propensity score matching. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality. A random-effects model calculated pooled hazard ratios and 95% CIs. Only databases meeting all diagnostic criteria were included in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Large-scale propensity score matching identified 166 005 patient pairs. During the 365-day follow-up, the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events did not differ significantly between patients receiving clopidogrel plus strong CYP2C19-inhibiting PPIs and those receiving clopidogrel plus weak or non-CYP2C19-inhibiting PPIs (17.63 per 1000 person-years versus 16.82 per 1000 person-years; calibrated hazard ratio, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.79-1.26]). No significant difference was observed in the risk of secondary outcomes (calibrated hazard ratio, cardiovascular mortality 1.10 [95% CI, 0.87-1.39], myocardial infarction 0.98 [95% CI, 0.81-1.19], stroke 1.05 [95% CI, 0.87-1.27], and all-cause mortality 1.18 [95% CI, 0.93-1.50]). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant use of clopidogrel and strong CYP2C19-inhibiting PPIs was not associated with a higher cardiovascular risk compared with concomitant use of clopidogrel and weak or non-CYP2C19-inhibiting PPIs. This large-scale study does not support the clinical significance of potential interactions between PPIs and clopidogrel.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Patients receiving clopidogrel antiplatelet therapy (n=332,010). Strong CYP2C19-inhibiting proton pump inhibitors (sPPIs) vs. Weak or non-CYP2C19-inhibiting proton pump inhibitors (wPPIs) was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.79-1.26). Concomitant use of clopidogrel and strong CYP2C19-inhibiting PPIs did not significantly increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared with weak or non-inhibiting PPIs (HR 1.00).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: