Retrospective cohort study examines neonatal outcomes before and after stopping left uterine displacement in cesarean deliveries, indicating further exploration is needed.
( Int J Obstet Anesth . 2025;62:104350 doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104350) For decades, obstetric anesthesia guidelines have recommended maintaining left uterine displacement (LUD) during cesarean delivery (CD) to reduce aortocaval compression. This position was assumed to improve maternal hemodynamics and neonatal outcomes by preventing compression of the inferior vena cava and aorta by the gravid uterus. However, supporting evidence has been inconsistent, often based on nonrandomized studies with mixed anesthetic techniques and limited use of vasopressors. Imaging studies suggest that the aorta is rarely compressed in the supine position, while LUD provides only minimal relief of vena cava obstruction. Moreover, it is often observed that the clinically prescribed 15-degree tilt is rarely achieved in practice, raising questions about the actual utility of this maneuver.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jackson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: