Examines the reliability of medical record reviews for identifying adverse events, suggesting needed procedural improvements.
This study provides evidence supporting the diversification of reviewer professions and types at each stage of retrospective medical record reviews to identify adverse events. However, establishing rigorous procedures to enhance interrater reliability, such as training in medical record review methods and conducting interim assessments during the review process, is essential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: