This review explores legal and bioethical issues surrounding hunger strikes, highlighting implications for medical professionals.
With an emphasis on the confluence of moral and legal issues within the context of Indian law, this review delves into the historical roots and current ramifications of hunger strikes as a peaceful mode of protest. Hunger strikes are an effective tactic for peacefully addressing perceived injustices and have their roots in India’s Gandhian era. Nonetheless, given the force-feeding technique and the participation of medical personnel, their method presents difficult legal and bioethical issues. Utilising pertinent case studies, this analysis seeks to clarify the developing legal and moral terrain surrounding hunger strikes, providing insights into the finely balanced relationship between personal autonomy, the right to protest, and the duty of care maintained by healthcare professionals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gaurang Narayan (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: