PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 7, 2026Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer0 citationsOpen Access

KRAS Mutation Status as a Prognostic Marker and Predictor of Therapy Response in Colorectal Cancer: an NCDB Analysis

MSMohyeddine El SayedMHMelhem El HaratiMSMiller W. Shealy

Key Points

  • This research aims to determine the prognostic value of KRAS mutation status in colorectal cancer and its association with treatment response.
  • Conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database
  • Analyzed data from 52,534 colorectal cancer patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2021
  • Evaluated overall survival with Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models
  • Stratified analyses by AJCC stage and treatment pathways
  • KRAS mutations were found in 39.9% of patients, often associated with right-sided and metastatic disease
  • Independent association of KRAS mutation with worse overall survival (HR 1.12)
  • Stage-specific hazards included HR 1.14 for stage II, HR 1.16 for stage III, and HR 1.07 for stage IV
  • KRAS mutation linked to inferior overall survival in several treatment regimens, including surgery and chemotherapy

Abstract

KRAS mutation is a prominent biomarker in colorectal cancer (CRC) and is associated with resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic disease. However, its prognostic value across stages and its association with survival within common treatment pathways remain incompletely defined in large real-world cohorts. We performed a retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database, identifying 52,534 patients with CRC diagnosed between 2010 and 2021 with documented KRAS mutation status. Demographic, clinicopathological, and treatment variables were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier methods and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, performed overall and stratified by AJCC stage. Exploratory analyses evaluated the association of KRAS status with OS within stage-specific treatment pathways. KRAS-mutant tumors comprised 39.9% of the cohort and were more frequently right-sided and metastatic at presentation and were less often poorly differentiated. KRAS mutation was independently associated with worse OS in the overall cohort (HR 1.12). Stage-specific associations were modest but statistically significant in stage II (HR 1.14), stage III (HR 1.16), and stage IV disease (HR 1.07). In exploratory treatment-pathway analyses, KRAS mutation was associated with inferior OS in several common regimens (e.g., surgery + chemotherapy in stage III and stage IV). KRAS mutation independently predicts poorer survival in CRC, particularly in earlier stages, and influences outcomes under multiple therapeutic regimens. These findings underscore the importance of KRAS testing to optimize individualized treatment strategies and guide novel interventions targeting KRAS-mutant CRC.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sayed et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69abc2855af8044f7a4ec319https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-026-01439-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The predictive value ofKRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CAand PTEN for anti-EGFR treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis2014 · 399 citations
  2. 2An immunohistochemical study of EGFR expression in colorectal cancer and its correlation with lymph nodes status and tumor grade.2012 · 13 citations
  3. 3A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis1990 · 12,179 citations
  4. 4Tumour heterogeneity and evolutionary dynamics in colorectal cancer2021 · 62 citations
  5. 5Genetic and microenvironmental intra-tumor heterogeneity impacts colorectal cancer evolution and metastatic development2022 · 48 citations